Discussion:
African American invented cellular phone, air conditioner,bloodbanks,open heart surgery.
(too old to reply)
Byker
2006-07-12 13:40:48 UTC
Permalink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed literature, art, agricultural skills, foods,
clothing styles, music, language, social and technological innovation to
American culture.
(bullshit snipped)

Black Invention Myths

Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of
African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without
traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast
number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life
without.

Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history.
Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology
outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be
fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments
with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to
extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a
slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken
for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with
little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's
no real evidence it was ever used.

Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially
during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing
board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the
truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does
not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should
at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.

Each item below is listed with its supposed black originator beneath it
along with the year it was supposedly invented, followed by something about
the real origin of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.

a.. Bibliography
b.. Email
Traffic Signal
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No!
The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the Houses
of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore arms and two
gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include Lester Wire's
two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912, James Hoge's system
(US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by the American Traffic Signal
Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way red-yellow-green lights introduced
in Detroit beginning in 1920. New York City traffic towers began flashing
three-color signals also in 1920.

Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among the
first half-hundred patented traffic signals, nor was it "automatic" as is
sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the evolution of the modern
traffic light. For details see Inventing History: Garrett Morgan and the
Traffic Signal.

Gas Mask
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No!
The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by
several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish chemist
John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the 1870s, among
many other inventors prior to World War I. See The Invention of the Gas
Mask.

Peanut Butter
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No!
Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into paste
by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut butter comes from
US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson of Montreal, Quebec in
1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts between heated surfaces until
the peanuts reached "a fluid or semi-fluid state." As the product cooled, it
set into what Edson described as "a consistency like that of butter, lard,
or ointment." In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St.
Louis, manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg,
of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his "Process of
Preparing Nutmeal," which produced a "pasty adhesive substance" that Kellogg
called "nut-butter."

George Washington Carver
"Discovered" hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut? Fathered
the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture? No!
Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the
National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National Monument),
demonstrated the following:

a.. Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either
unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product born in
his laboratory was widely adopted.
b.. The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and not
as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop.
c.. Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of
pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact.
To see how Carver gained "a popular reputation far transcending the
significance of his accomplishments," read Mackintosh's excellent article
George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth.

Automatic Lubricator, "Real McCoy"
Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first device
to automatically oil machinery? No! The phrase "Real McCoy" arose to
distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No!
The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of lubricant to
machine parts while the machine is running, predates McCoy's career; a
description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue of Scientific American.
The automatic "displacement lubricator" for steam engines was developed in
1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and notably improved in 1862 by James
Roscoe of the same country. The "hydrostatic" lubricator originated no later
than 1871.

Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating
back to at least 1856 - well before Elijah McCoy could have been involved.

Detailed evidence: The not-so-real McCoy
Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?

Blood Bank
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No!
During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved blood
in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers for later
transfusion. This was the first use of "banked" blood. By the mid-1930s the
Russians had set up a national network of facilities for the collection,
typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus, influenced by the Russian
program, established the first hospital blood bank in the United States at
Chicago's Cook County Hospital in 1937. It was Fantus who coined the term
"blood bank." See highlights of transfusion history from the American
Association of Blood Banks.

Blood Plasma
Did Charles Drew "discover" (in about 1940) that plasma could be separated
and stored apart from the rest of the blood, thereby revolutionizing
transfusion medicine? No!
The possibility of using blood plasma for transfusion purposes was known
at least since 1918, when English physician Gordon R. Ward suggested it in a
medical journal. In the mid-1930s, John Elliott advanced the idea,
emphasizing plasma's advantages in shelf life and donor-recipient
compatibility, and in 1939 he and two colleagues reported having used stored
plasma in 191 transfusions. (See historical notes on plasma use.) Charles
Drew was not responsible for any breakthrough scientific or medical
discovery; his main career achievement lay in supervising or co-supervising
major programs for the collection and shipment of blood and plasma.

More: Charles Drew Mythology

Washington DC city plan
Benjamin Banneker? No!
Pierre-Charles L'Enfant created the layout of Washington DC. Banneker
assisted Andrew Ellicott in the survey of the federal territory, but played
no direct role in the actual planning of the city. The story of Banneker
reconstructing the city design from memory after L'Enfant ran away with the
plans (with the implication that the project would have failed if not for
Banneker) has been debunked by historians.

Filament for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer invented the carbon filament in 1881 or 1882? No!
English chemist/physicist Joseph Swan experimented with a carbon-filament
incandescent light all the way back in 1860, and by 1878 had developed a
better design which he patented in Britain. On the other side of the
Atlantic, Thomas Edison developed a successful carbon-filament bulb,
receiving a patent for it (#223898) in January 1880, before Lewis Latimer
did any work in electric lighting. From 1880 onward, countless patents were
issued for innovations in filament design and manufacture (Edison had over
50 of them). Neither of Latimer's two filament-related patents in 1881 and
1882 were among the most important innovations, nor did they make the light
bulb last longer, nor is there reason to believe they were adopted outside
Hiram Maxim's company where Latimer worked at the time. (He was not hired by
Edison's company until 1884, primarily as a draftsman and an expert witness
in patent litigations).

Latimer also did not come up with the first screw socket for the light
bulb or the first book on electric lighting.

Heart Surgery (first successful)
Dr. Daniel Hale Williams in 1893? No!
Dr. Williams repaired a wound not in the heart muscle itself, but in the
sac surrounding it, the pericardium. This operation was not the first of its
type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly identical operation two
years earlier, with the patient fully recovering. Decades before that, the
Spaniard Francisco Romero carried out the first successful pericardial
surgery of any type, incising the pericardium to drain fluid compressing the
heart.

Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the pericardium,
was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of Germany when he
repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than 50 years later came
surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei
(often called the "father of open heart surgery") and John Gibbon (who
invented the heart-lung machine).

What medical historians say...

"Third Rail"
Granville Woods in 1901? No!
Werner von Siemens pioneered the use of an electrified third rail as a
means for powering railway vehicles when he demonstrated an experimental
electric train at the 1879 Berlin Industrial Exhibition. In the US,
English-born Leo Daft used a third-rail system to electrify the Baltimore &
Hampden lines in 1885. The first electrically powered subway trains, which
debuted in London in the autumn of 1890, likewise drew power from a third
rail. Details...

Railway Telegraph
Granville Woods prevented railway accidents and saved countless lives by
inventing the train telegraph (patented in 1887), which allowed
communication to and from moving trains? No!
The earliest patents for train telegraphs go back to at least 1873. Lucius
Phelps was the first inventor in the field to attract widespread notice, and
the telegrams he exchanged on the New York, New Haven & Hartford railroad in
January 1885 were hailed in the Feb. 21, 1885 issue of Scientific American
as "perhaps the first ever sent to and from a moving train." Phelps remained
at the forefront in developing the technology and by the end of 1887 already
held 14 US patents on his system. He joined a team led by Thomas Edison, who
had been working on his "grasshopper telegraph" for trains, and together
they constructed on the Lehigh Valley Railroad one of the only induction
telegraph systems ever put to commercial use. Although this telegraph was a
technical success, it fulfilled no public need, and the market for on-board
train telegraphy never took off. There is no evidence that any commercial
railway telegraph based on Granville Woods's patents was ever built. About
the patent interference case

Refrigerated Truck
Frederick Jones (with Joseph Numero) in 1938? No! Did Jones change
America's eating habits by making possible the long-distance shipment of
perishable foods? No!
Refrigerated ships and railcars had been moving perishables across oceans
and continents even before Jones was born (see refrigerated transport
timeline). Trucks with mechanically refrigerated cargo spaces appeared on
the roads at least as early as the late 1920s (see the proof). Further
development of truck refrigeration was more a process of gradual evolution
than radical change.

Air Brake / Automatic Air Brake
Granville Woods in 1904? No!
In 1869, a 22-year-old George Westinghouse received US patent #88929 for a
brake device operated by compressed air, and in the same year organized the
Westinghouse Air Brake Company. Many of the 361 patents he accumulated
during his career were for air brake variations and improvements, including
his first "automatic" version in 1872 (US #124404).

Air Conditioner
Frederick Jones in 1949? No!
Dr. Willis Carrier built the first machine to control both the temperature
and humidity of indoor air. He received the first of many patents in 1906
(US patent #808897, for the "Apparatus for Treating Air"). In 1911 he
published the formulae that became the scientific basis for air conditioning
design, and four years later formed the Carrier Engineering Corporation to
develop and manufacture AC systems.

Airship
J.F. Pickering in 1900? No!
French engineer Henri Giffard successfully flew a powered navigable
airship in 1852. The La France airship built by Charles Renard and Arthur
Krebs in 1884 featured an electric motor and improved steering capabilities.
In 1900 Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin's first rigid-framed dirigible took to
the air. Of the hundreds of inventors granted patents for early airship
designs and modifications, few succeeded in building or flying their craft.
There doesn't appear to be any record of a "Pickering Airship" ever getting
off the ground.

US Aviation Patent Database, 1799-1909

Automatic Railroad Car Coupler
Andrew Beard invented the "Jenny [sic] coupler" in 1897? No!
The Janney coupler is named for US Civil War veteran Eli H. Janney, who in
1873 invented a device (US patent #138405) which automatically linked
together two railroad cars upon their being brought into contact. Also known
as the "knuckle coupler," Janney's invention superseded the dangerous
link-and-pin coupler and became the basis for standard coupler design
through the remainder of the millennium. Andrew Beard's modified knuckle
coupler was just one of approximately eight thousand coupler variations
patented by 1900. See a history of the automatic coupler and also The Janney
Coupler.

Automatic Transmission/Gearshift
Richard Spikes in 1932? No!
The first automatic-transmission automobile to enter the market was
designed by the Sturtevant brothers of Massachusetts in 1904. US Patent
#766551 was the first of several patents on their gearshift mechanism.
Automatic transmission technology continued to develop, spawning hundreds of
patents and numerous experimental units; but because of cost, reliability
issues and an initial lack of demand, several decades passed before vehicles
with automatic transmission became common on the roads.

Bicycle Frame
Isaac R. Johnson in 1899? No!
Comte Mede de Sivrac and Karl von Sauerbronn built primitive versions of
the bicycle in 1791 and 1816 respectively. The frame of John Starley's 1885
"safety bicycle" resembled that of a modern bicycle.

Cellular Phone
Henry T. Sampson in 1971? No!
On July 6, 1971, Sampson and co-inventor George Miley received a patent on
a "gamma electric cell" that converted a gamma ray input into an electrical
output (Among the first to do that was Bernhard Gross, US patent #3122640,
1964). What, you ask, does gamma radiation have to do with cellular
communications technology? The answer: nothing. Some multiculturalist
pseudo-historian must have seen the words "electric" and "cell" and thought
"cell phone."

The father of the cell phone is Martin Cooper who first demonstrated the
technology in 1973.

Clock or Watch (First in America)
Benjamin Banneker built the first American timepiece in 1753? No!
Abel Cottey, a Quaker clockmaker from Philadelphia, built a clock that is
dated 1709 (source: Six Quaker Clockmakers, by Edward C. Chandlee;
Philadelphia, The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1943). Banneker
biographer Silvio Bedini further refutes the myth:

Several watch and clockmakers were already established in the colony
[Maryland] prior to the time that Banneker made the clock. In Annapolis
alone there were at least four such craftsmen prior to 1750. Among these may
be mentioned John Batterson, a watchmaker who moved to Annapolis in 1723;
James Newberry, a watch and clockmaker who advertised in the Maryland
Gazette on July 20, 1748; John Powell, a watch and clockmaker believed to
have been indentured and to have been working in 1745; and Powell's master,
William Roberts.

Silvio Bedini, The Life of Benjamin Banneker (Baltimore: Maryland
Historical Society, 1999)

Clothes Dryer
George T. Sampson in 1892? No!
The "clothes-drier" described in Sampson's patent was actually a rack for
holding clothes near a stove, and was intended as an "improvement" on
similar contraptions:

My invention relates to improvements in clothes-driers.... The object of
my invention is to suspend clothing in close relation to a stove by means of
frames so constructed that they can be readily placed in proper position and
put aside when not required for use.

US patent #476416, 1892

Nineteen years earlier, there were already over 300 US patents for such
"clothes-driers" (Subject-Matter Index of Patents...1790 to 1873).

A Frenchman named Pochon in 1799 built the first known tumble dryer - a
crank-driven, rotating metal drum pierced with ventilation holes and held
over heat. Electric tumble dryers appeared in the first half of the 20th
century.

Dustpan
Lloyd P. Ray in 1897? No!
While the ultimate origin of the dustpan is lost in the mists (dusts?) of
time, at least we know that US patent #20811 for "Dust-pan" was granted to
T.E. McNeill in 1858. That was the first of about 164 US dustpan patents
predating Lloyd Ray's. See the dustpan patent list.

Egg Beater
Willie Johnson in 1884? No!
The hand-cranked egg beater with two intermeshed, counter-rotating whisks
was invented by Turner Williams of Providence, Rhode Island in 1870 (US
Patent #103811). It was an improvement on earlier rotary egg beaters that
had only one whisk.

Electric Trolley
Did Granville Woods invent the electric trolley car, the overhead wire
that powers it, or the "troller" wheel that makes contact with the trolley
wire, in 1888? No!
Dr. Werner von Siemens demonstrated his electric trolleybus, the
Elektromote, near Berlin on April 29, 1882. The vehicle's two electric
motors collected power through contact wheels rolling atop a pair of
overhead wires. The earliest patentee of an electric trolley in the United
States appears to be Eugene Cowles (#252193 in 1881), followed by Dr. Joseph
R. Finney (#268476 in 1882) who operated an experimental trolley car near
Pittsburgh, PA in the summer of 1882. In early 1885, John C. Henry
established in Kansas City, MO, the first overhead-wire electric transit
system to enter regular service in the United States. Belgian-born Charles
van Depoele, who earned 240+ patents in electric railway technology and
other fields, set up trolley lines in several North American cities by 1887.
In February 1888, a trolley system designed by Frank Sprague began operating
in Richmond, Virginia. Sprague's system became the lasting prototype for
electric street railways in the US.

Elevator
Alexander Miles in 1887? No!
Was Miles the first to patent a self-closing shaft door? No!
Steam-powered hoisting devices were used in England by 1800. Elisha Graves
Otis' 1853 "safety elevator" prevented the car from falling if the cable
broke, and thus paved the way for the first commercial passenger elevator,
installed in New York City's Haughwout Department Store in 1857. The first
electric elevator appeared in Mannheim, Germany in 1880, built by the German
firm of Siemens and Halske. A self-closing shaft door was invented by J.W.
Meaker in 1874 ("Improvement in Self-closing Hatchways," US Patent No.
147,853). See Elevator Timeline

Fastest Computer/Computation
Was Philip Emeagwali responsible for the world's fastest computer or
computation in 1989? Did he win the "Nobel Prize of computing"? Is he a
"father of the Internet"? No!
The fastest performance of a computer application in 1989 was 6 billion
floating point operations per second (6 Gflops), achieved by a team from
Mobil and Thinking Machines Corp. on a 64,000-processor "Connection Machine"
invented by Danny Hillis. That was almost double the 3.1 Gflops of
Emeagwali's computation. Computing's Nobel Prize equivalent is the Turing
Award, which Emeagwali has never won. More...

Fire Escape
Joseph Winters in 1878? No!
Winters' "fire escape" was a wagon-mounted ladder. The first such
contraption patented in the US was the work of William P. Withey, 1840 (US
patent #1599). The fire escape with a "lazy-tongs" type ladder, more similar
to Winters' patent, was pioneered by Hüttman and Kornelio in 1849 (US patent
#6155). One of the first fire escapes of any type was invented in
18th-century England:

In 1784, Daniel Maseres, of England, invented a machine called a fire
escape, which, being fastened to the window, would enable anyone to descend
to the street without injury.

Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888

By 1888 the US had granted 1,099 patents on fire escapes of "many forms,
and of every possible material" (Butterworth).

Fire Extinguisher
Thomas J. Martin in 1872? No!
In 1813, British army captain George Manby created the first known
portable fire extinguisher: a two-foot-tall copper cylinder that held 3
gallons of water and used compressed air as a propellant. One of the
earliest extinguishers to use a chemical extinguishing agent, and not just
water, was invented in 1849 by the Englishman William Henry Phillips, who
patented his "fire annihilator" in England and the United States (US patent
#7,269).

Food Additives, Meat Curing
Lloyd Hall "is responsible for the meat curing products, seasonings,
emulsions, bakery products, antioxidants, protein hydrolysates, and many
other products that keep our food fresh and flavorable"? No! Hall
"revolutionized the meatpacking industry"? No!
Hall introduced no major class of additive, certainly not meat curing
salts (which are ancient), protein hydrolysates (popularized by Julius Maggi
as flavor enhancers in 1886), emulsifiers and antioxidants (lecithin, for
example, was used in both roles before Lloyd Hall had any patents in food
processing). The so-called revolutionary meat curing product marketed by
Hall's employer was invented primarily by Karl Max Seifert?; the number of
Seifert's patent was printed right on the containers. Hall's main
contribution to this product was to reduce its tendency to cake during
storage. Details: Lloyd Hall myth.

Fountain Pen
W.B. Purvis in 1890? No!
The first reference to what seems to be a fountain pen appears in an
Arabic text from 969 AD; details of the instrument are not known. A French
"Bion" pen, dated 1702, represents the oldest fountain pen that still
survives. Later models included John Scheffer's 1819 pen, possibly the first
to be mass-produced; John Jacob Parker's "self-filling" pen of 1832; and the
famous Lewis Waterman pen of 1884 (US Patents #293545, #307735). Early
History of the Fountain Pen

Golf Tee
Dr. George Grant in 1899? No!
A small rubber platform invented by Scotsmen William Bloxsom and Arthur
Douglas was the world's first patented golf tee (British patent #12941 of
1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, in contrast to earlier
tees that sat on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in 1892
by Percy Ellis of England. American dentist William Lowell introduced the
most common form of tee used today, the simple wooden peg with a flared top.
Details...

Hairbrush
Lyda Newman in 1898? No!
An early US patent for a recognizably modern hairbrush went to Hugh Rock
in 1854 (US Design Patent no. D645), though surely there were hairbrushes
long before there was a US Patent Office.

The claim that Lyda Newman's brush was the first with "synthetic bristles"
is false: her patent mentions nothing about synthetic bristles and is
concerned only with a new way of making the handle detachable from the head.
Besides, a hairbrush that included "elastic wire teeth" in combination with
natural bristles had already been patented by Samuel Firey in 1870 (US,
#106680). Nylon bristles weren't possible until the invention of nylon in
1935.

Halogen Lamp
Frederick Mosby? No
The original patent for the tungsten halogen lamp (US #2,883,571; April
21, 1959) is recorded to Elmer G. Fridrich and Emmett H. Wiley of General
Electric. The two had built a working prototype as early as 1953. Fred Mosby
was part of the GE team charged with developing the prototype lamp into a
marketable product, but was not responsible for the original halogen lamp or
the concept behind it.

Hand Stamp
William Purvis in 1883? No!
The earliest known postal handstamp was brought into use by Henry Bishop,
Postmaster General of Great Britain, in the year 1661. The stamp imprinted
the mail with a bisected circle containing the month and the date. See
"Bishop marks"

Heating Furnace
Alice Parker in 1919? No!
In the hypocaust heating systems built by the ancient Romans, hot air from
a furnace circulated under the floor and up through channels inside the
walls, thereby distributing heat evenly around the building. One of the most
famous heating systems in recent centuries was the iron furnace stove known
as the "Franklin stove," named after its purported originator Benjamin
Franklin around 1745 AD. The US had issued over 4000 patents for heating
stoves and furnaces by 1888 (Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art,
1888).

Horseshoe
Oscar E. Brown in 1892? No!
Some sources on the web, if not ignorant enough to say Brown invented the
first horseshoe ever, will at least try to credit him for the first double
or compound horseshoe made of two layers: one permanently secured to the
hoof, and one auxiliary layer that can be removed and replaced when it wears
out. However, in the US there were already 39 earlier patents for horseshoes
using that same concept. The first of these was issued to J.B. Kendall of
Boston in 1861, patent #33709.

Ice Cream
Augustus Jackson in 1832? No!
Flavored ices resembling sherbet were known in China in ancient times. In
Europe, sherbet-like concoctions evolved into ice cream by the 16th century,
and around 1670 or so, the Café Procope in Paris offered creamy frozen dairy
desserts to the public. The first written record of ice cream in the New
World comes from a letter dated 1700, attesting that Maryland Governor
William Bladen served the treat to his guests. In 1777, the New York Gazette
advertised the sale of ice cream by confectioner Philip Lenzi. History of
Ice Cream

Ironing Board
Sarah Boone in 1892? No!
Of the several hundred US patents on ironing boards granted prior to Sarah
Boone's, the first three went to William Vandenburg in 1858 (patents #19390,
#19883, #20231). The first American female patentee of an ironing board is
probably Sarah Mort of Dayton, Ohio, who received patent #57170 in 1866. In
1869, Henry Soggs of Columbus, Pennsylvania earned US patent #90966 for an
ironing board resembling the modern type, with folding legs, adjustable
height, and a cover. Another nice example of a modern-looking board was
designed by J.H. Mallory in 1871, patent #120296. Details...

Laser Cataract Surgery
Patricia Bath "transformed eye surgery" by inventing the first laser
device to treat cataracts in 1986? No!
Use of lasers to treat cataracts in the eye began to develop in the mid
1970s. M.M. Krasnov of Russia reported the first such procedure in 1975. One
of the earliest US patents for laser cataract removal (#3,982,541) was
issued to Francis L'Esperance in 1976. In later years, a number of
experimenters worked independently on laser devices for removing cataracts,
including Daniel Eichenbaum, whose work became the basis of the Paradigm
PhotonT device; and Jack Dodick, whose Dodick Laser PhotoLysis System
eventually became the first laser unit to win FDA approval for cataract
removal in the United States. Still, the majority of cataract surgeries
continue to be performed using ultrasound devices, not lasers. Details...

Lawn Mower
John Burr in 1899? No!
English engineer Edwin Budding invented the first reel-type lawn mower
(with blades arranged in a cylindrical pattern) and had it patented in
England in 1830. In 1868 the United States issued patent #73807 to Amariah
M. Hills of Connecticut, who went on to establish the Archimedean Lawn Mower
Co. in 1871. By 1888, the US Patent Office had granted 138 patents for lawn
mowers (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art). Doubtlessly there were even
more by the time Burr got his patent in 1899.

Some website authors want Burr to have invented the first "rotary blade"
mower, with a centrally mounted spinning blade. But his patent #624749 shows
yet another twist on the old reel mower, differing in only a few details
with Budding's original.

Lawn Sprinkler
J. H. Smith in 1897? Elijah McCoy? No!
The first US patent with the title "lawn sprinkler" was issued to J.
Lessler of Buffalo, New York in 1871 (#121949). Early examples of
water-propelled, rotating lawn sprinklers were patented by J. Oswald in 1890
(#425340) and J. S. Woolsey in 1891 (#457099) among a gazillion others.

Smith's patent shows just another rotating sprinkler, and McCoy's 1899
patent was for a turtle-shaped sprinkler.

Mailbox (letter drop box)
P. Downing invented the street letter drop box in 1891? No!
George Becket invented the private mailbox in 1892? No!
The US Postal Service says that "Street boxes for mail collection began to
appear in large [US] cities by 1858." They appeared in Europe even earlier,
according to historian Laurin Zilliacus:

Mail boxes as we understand them first appeared on the streets of
Belgian towns in 1848. In Paris they came two years later, while the English
received their 'pillar boxes' in 1855.

Laurin Zilliacus, Mail for the World, p. 178 (New York, J. Day Co.,
1953)

From the same book (p.178), "Private mail boxes were invented in the
United States in about 1860."

Eventually, letter drop boxes came equipped with inner lids to prevent
miscreants from rummaging through the mail pile. The first of many US
patents for such a purpose was granted in 1860 to John North of Middletown,
Connecticut (US Pat. #27466).

Mop
Thomas W. Stewart in 1893? No!
Mops go back a long, long way before 1893. Just how long, is hard to
determine. Restricting our view to the modern era, we find that the United
States issued its first mop patent (#241) in 1837 to Jacob Howe, called
"Construction of Mop-Heads and the Mode of Securing them upon Handles." One
of the first patented mops with a built-in wringer was the one H. & J.
Morton invented in 1859 (US #24049).

The mop specified in Stewart's patent #499402 has a lever-operated clamp
for "holding the mop rags"; the lever is not a wringing mechanism as
erroneously reported on certain websites. Other inventors had already
patented mops with lever-operated clamps, one of the first being Greenleaf
Stackpole in 1869 (US Pat. #89803).

Paper Punch (hand-held)
Charles Brooks in 1893? No!
Was it the first with a hinged receptacle to catch the clippings? No!
The first numbered US patent for a hand-held hole punch was #636, issued
to Solyman Merrick in 1838. Robert James Kellett earned the first two US
patents for a chad-catching hole punch, in 1867 (patent #65090) and 1868
(#79232).

Pencil Sharpener
John Lee Love in 1897? No!
Bernard Lassimone of Limoges, France invented one of the earliest
sharpeners, receiving French patent number 2444 in 1828. An apparent
ancestor of the 20th-century hand-cranked sharpener was patented by G. F.
Ballou in 1896 (US #556709) and marketed by the A.B. Dick Company as the
"Planetary Pencil Pointer." As the user held the pencil stationary and
turned the crank, twin milling cutters revolved around the tip of the pencil
and shaved it into a point.

Love's patent #594114 shows a variation on a different kind of sharpener,
in which one would crank the pencil itself around in a stirring motion. An
earlier device of a similar type was devised in 1888 by G.H. Courson (patent
#388533), and sold under the name "President Pencil Sharpener."

Here are several other examples of 19th century sharpeners:
Early Mechanical Pencil Sharpeners
Mechanical Pencil Sharpener Gallery ~ 1884-1899

Permanent Wave Machine (for perming hair)
Marjorie Joyner in 1928? No!
That would be German hairdresser Karl Ludwig Nessler (aka Charles Nestlé)
no later than 1906.

Postmarking and Canceling Machine
William Barry in 1897? No!
Try Pearson Hill of England, in 1857. Hill's machine marked the postage
stamp with vertical lines and postmark date. By 1892, US post offices were
using several brands of machines, including one that could cancel, postmark,
count and stack more than 20,000 pieces of mail per hour (Marshall Cushing,
Story of Our Post Office, Boston: A. M. Thayer & co., 1892, pp.189-191).

Printing Press
W.A. Lavalette invented "the advanced printing press" in 1878? No!
Movable-type printing first appeared in East Asia. In Europe, around 1455,
Johann Gutenberg adapted the screw press used in other trades such as
winemaking and combined it with type-metal alloy characters and oil-based
printing ink. Major advances after Gutenberg include the cylinder printing
press (c. 1811) by Frederick Koenig and Andreas Bauer, the rotary press
(1846) by Richard M. Hoe, and the web press (1865) by William Bullock. Major
advances do not include Lavalette's patent, which was only one of 3,268
printing patents granted in the US by the year 1888 (Butterworth, Growth of
Industrial Art). Improvements After Gutenberg

Propeller for Ship
George Tolivar or Benjamin Montgomery? No!
John Stevens constructed a boat with twin steam-powered propellers in 1804
in the first known application of a screw propeller for marine propulsion.
Other important pioneers in the early 1800s included Sir Francis Pettit
Smith of England, and Swedish-born ship designer John Ericsson (US patent
#588) who later designed the USS Monitor.

Refrigerator
Thomas Elkins in 1879? John Stanard in 1891? No!
Oliver Evans proposed a mechanical refrigerator based on a
vapor-compression cycle in 1805 and Jacob Perkins had a working machine
built in 1834. Dr. John Gorrie created an air-cycle refrigeration system in
about 1844, which he installed in a Florida hospital. In the 1850s Alexander
Twining in the USA and James Harrison in Australia used mechanical
refrigeration to produce ice on a commercial scale. Around the same time,
the Carré brothers of France led the development of absorption refrigeration
systems. A more detailed timeline

Stanard's patent describes not a refrigeration machine, but an
old-fashioned icebox - an insulated cabinet into which ice is placed to cool
the interior. As such, it was a "refrigerator" only in the old sense of the
term, which included non-mechanical coolers. Elkins created a similarly
low-tech cooler, acknowledging in his patent #221222 that "I am aware that
chilling substances inclosed within a porous box or jar by wetting its outer
surface is an old and well-known process."

Rotary Engine
Andrew Beard in 1892? No!
The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States Patent
Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists 394 "Rotary Engine" patents from
1810-1873. The Wankel engine, a rotary combustion engine with a four-stroke
cycle, dates from 1954. History of the Rotary Engine from 1588 Onward

Screw Socket for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer? No!
The earliest evidence for a light bulb screw base design is a drawing in a
Thomas Edison notebook dated Sept. 11, 1880. It is not the work of Latimer,
though:

Edison's long-time associates, Edward H. Johnson and John Ott, were
principally responsible for designing fixtures in the fall of 1880. Their
work resulted in the screw socket and base very much like those widely used
today.

R. Friedel and P. Israel, Edison's Electric Light: Biography of an
Invention, (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1986).

The 1880 sketch of the screw socket is reproduced in the book cited above.

Smallpox Vaccine
Onesimus the slave in 1721? No! Onesimus knew of variolation, an early
inoculation technique practiced in several areas of the world before the
discovery of vaccination.
English physician Edward Jenner developed the smallpox vaccine in 1796
after finding that the relatively innocuous cowpox virus built immunity
against the deadly smallpox. This discovery led to the eventual eradication
of endemic smallpox throughout the world. Vaccination differs from the
primitive inoculation method known as variolation, which involved the
deliberate planting of live smallpox into a healthy person in hopes of
inducing a mild form of the disease that would provide immunity from further
infection. Variolation not only was risky to the patient but, more
importantly, failed to prevent smallpox from spreading. Known in Asia by
1000 AD, the practice reached the West via more than one channel.

Smokestack for Locomotives
L. Bell in 1871? No!
Even the first steam locomotives, such as the one built by Richard
Trevithick in 1804, were equipped with smokestacks. Later smokestacks
featured wire netting to prevent hazardous sparks from escaping. Page 115 of
John H. White Jr.'s American Locomotives: An Engineering History, 1830-1880
(1997 edition) displays a composite picture showing 57 different types of
spark-arresting smokestacks devised before 1860.

Steam Boiler Furnace
Granville Woods in 1884? No!
The steam engine boiler is of course as old as the steam engine itself.
The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States Patent
Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists several hundred variations and
improvements to the steam boiler, including the revolutionary water-tube
boiler patented in 1867 by American inventors George Herman Babcock and
Stephen Wilcox.

Street Sweeper
Charles Brooks in 1896? No!
Brooks' patent was for a modified version of a common type of street
sweeper cart that had long been known, with a rotary brush that swept refuse
onto an elevator belt and into a trash bin. In the United States, street
sweepers started being patented in the 1840s, and by 1900 the Patent Office
had issued about 300 patents for such machines. Details...

Supercharger for Automobiles
Joseph Gammel/Gamell in 1976? No!
In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler received a German patent for supercharging an
internal combustion engine. Louis Renault patented a centrifugal
supercharger in France in 1902. An early supercharged racecar was built by
Lee Chadwick of Pottstown, Pennsylvania in 1908 and reportedly reached a
speed of 100 miles per hour. History of Supercharging

Toilet
T. Elkins in 1897? No!
The Minoans of Crete are said to have invented a flush toilet thousands of
years ago; however, there is probably no direct ancestral relationship
between it and the modern one that evolved primarily in England starting in
the late 16th century, when Sir John Harrington devised a flushing device
for his godmother Queen Elizabeth. In 1775 Alexander Cummings patented a
toilet in which some water remained after each flush, thereby suppressing
odors from below. The "water closet" continued to evolve, and in 1885,
Thomas Twyford provided us with a single-piece ceramic toilet similar to the
one we know today. Who Invented the Toilet?

Toilet for Railroad Cars
Lewis Latimer in 1874? No!
William E. Marsh Jr. of New Jersey took out US patent #95597 for
"Improvement in Water-closets for Railroad Cars" five years prior to
Latimer's 1874 patent with the same title. Marsh's patent specification
suggests that railroad-car water closets, i.e., toilets, were already in
use:

In the closets or privies of railroad cars, the cold and wind,
especially while the train is in motion, are very disagreeable... My
invention is to remove these objectionable features....

W. Marsh, US patent #95597, 1869

Tricycle
M.A. Cherry in 1886? No!
In Germany in the year 1680 or thereabouts, paraplegic watchmaker Stephan
Farffler built his own tricycle at 22 years of age. He designed it to be
pedaled with the hands, for obvious reasons. History of the tricycle

Turn Signals
Richard Spikes in 1913? No! Did the 1913 Pierce Arrow feature Spikes' turn
signals? No!
Electric turn signal lights were devised as early as 1907 (U.S. Patent
912,831), but were not widely offered by major automobile manufacturers
until the late 1930s, when GM developed its own version and made it standard
on Buicks. The Pierce Arrow Museum in Buffalo, NY denies that directional
signals were offered on 1913 Pierce Arrows.

Typewriter
L.S. Burridge & N.R. Marshman in 1885? No!
Henry Mill, an English engineer, was the first person to patent the basic
idea of the typewriter in 1714. The first working typewriter known to have
actually been built was the work of Pellegrino Turri of Italy in 1808.
Americans C. L. Sholes and C. Glidden patented the familiar QWERTY keyboard
in 1868 and brought it to market in 1873. In 1878 change-case keys were
added that enabled the typing of both capital and small letters. Typewriter
History


http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/
M***@Commie.Whoremonger.Plagiarists.edu
2006-07-24 06:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy
of African-American inventors,
Could "sawa" be the *Real McNig*?

lol
Mastic
2006-07-25 10:35:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by M***@Commie.Whoremonger.Plagiarists.edu
Post by Byker
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy
of African-American inventors,
Could "sawa" be the *Real McNig*?
Yes.
laraine
2006-07-29 04:53:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Byker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed literature, art, agricultural skills, foods,
clothing styles, music, language, social and technological innovation to
American culture.
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of
African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without
traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast
number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life
without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history.
Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology
outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be
fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments
with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to
extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a
slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken
for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with
little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's
no real evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially
during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing
board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the
truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does
not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should
at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.

Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.

C. (laraine)
Way Back Jack
2006-07-29 10:45:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by laraine
Post by Byker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed literature, art, agricultural skills, foods,
clothing styles, music, language, social and technological innovation to
American culture.
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of
African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without
traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast
number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life
without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history.
Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology
outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be
fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments
with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to
extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a
slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken
for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with
little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's
no real evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially
during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing
board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the
truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does
not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should
at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.
Actually, American society has bent over backwards to try to educate
blacks but as long as black youth have the prevailing thought "Oh
edumacaushun be a whyte thang." it ain't gonna happen, hon.
Post by laraine
Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.
C. (laraine)
If you choose to live in fantasy world, knock y'self out.
laraine
2006-07-29 17:19:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Post by Byker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed literature, art, agricultural skills, foods,
clothing styles, music, language, social and technological innovation to
American culture.
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of
African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without
traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast
number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life
without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history.
Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology
outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be
fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments
with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to
extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a
slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken
for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with
little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's
no real evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially
during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing
board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the
truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does
not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should
at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.
Actually, American society has bent over backwards to try to educate
blacks but as long as black youth have the prevailing thought "Oh
edumacaushun be a whyte thang." it ain't gonna happen, hon.
I'm being quite serious here.
We're talking about the late 19th and early 20th
century, when Jim Crow laws in the South
segregated schools, and talented blacks
generally attended 'Negro colleges,' which
sometimes emphasized more of a community
college atmosphere rather than a university one.
I'm not sure about the situation in the North--
DuBois did graduate from Harvard in 1890.
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.
C. (laraine)
If you choose to live in fantasy world, knock y'self out.
Wikipedia describes a fantasy world???

C.
unknown
2006-07-29 18:49:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Post by Byker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American
From their earliest presence in North America, Africans and African
Americans have contributed literature, art, agricultural skills, foods,
clothing styles, music, language, social and technological innovation to
American culture.
(bullshit snipped)
Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy of
African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world without
traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb filaments, and a vast
number of other things we now take for granted but could hardly imagine life
without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black history.
Since many of the authors have little interest in the history of technology
outside of advertising black contributions to it, their stories tend to be
fraught with misunderstandings, wishful thinking, or fanciful embellishments
with no historical basis. The lack of historical perspective leads to
extravagant overestimations of originality and importance: sometimes a
slightly modified version of a pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken
for the first invention of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with
little or no lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's
no real evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets, especially
during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic light and ironing
board). When myths go unchallenged for too long, they begin to eclipse the
truth. Thus I decided to put some records straight. Although this page does
not cover every dubious invention claim floating around out there, it should
at least serve as a warning never to take any such claim for granted.
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.
Actually, American society has bent over backwards to try to educate
blacks but as long as black youth have the prevailing thought "Oh
edumacaushun be a whyte thang." it ain't gonna happen, hon.
I'm being quite serious here.
We're talking about the late 19th and early 20th
century, when Jim Crow laws in the South
segregated schools, and talented blacks
generally attended 'Negro colleges,' which
sometimes emphasized more of a community
college atmosphere rather than a university one.
I'm not sure about the situation in the North--
DuBois did graduate from Harvard in 1890.
And now that society bends over backwards for blacks to become
educated, even to the point of providing unconstitutional racial
preferences, the academic achievement gap keeps widening.
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.
C. (laraine)
If you choose to live in fantasy world, knock y'self out.
Wikipedia describes a fantasy world???
A lotta feel-good left wing propaganda in Wikipedia.
Post by laraine
C.
laraine
2006-08-05 05:11:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.
Actually, American society has bent over backwards to try to educate
blacks but as long as black youth have the prevailing thought "Oh
edumacaushun be a whyte thang." it ain't gonna happen, hon.
I'm being quite serious here.
We're talking about the late 19th and early 20th
century, when Jim Crow laws in the South
segregated schools, and talented blacks
generally attended 'Negro colleges,' which
sometimes emphasized more of a community
college atmosphere rather than a university one.
I'm not sure about the situation in the North--
DuBois did graduate from Harvard in 1890.
And now that society bends over backwards for blacks to become
educated, even to the point of providing unconstitutional racial
preferences, the academic achievement gap keeps widening.
That has been discussed before in misc.education,
and I believe it was stated that it is not clear that
preference points given to blacks added up to
more than those given to whites for other reasons.

In addition, even if blacks get some help when
going to college, many of them have been at a
disadvantage all their lives in inner city schools,
so I don't see how that could work well.
Post by unknown
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.
C. (laraine)
If you choose to live in fantasy world, knock y'self out.
Wikipedia describes a fantasy world???
A lotta feel-good left wing propaganda in Wikipedia.
It seems fair to me, though a bit US-centered. (Would
have to read it in other languages to know for sure.)

C.
unknown
2006-08-05 15:41:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by laraine
Post by unknown
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
So what is being implied here, if one
deconstructs your text a bit, is that
African-Americans have been quite
involved in the sciences and with
invention, much more than most of
us generally realize, in spite of the
fact that, in the past, they were often
not admitted to many universities simply
because of the color of their skin.
And it is also true that the exact details
of their contributions have sometimes
been mythologized, just as contributions
of many historical figures have been.
Actually, American society has bent over backwards to try to educate
blacks but as long as black youth have the prevailing thought "Oh
edumacaushun be a whyte thang." it ain't gonna happen, hon.
I'm being quite serious here.
We're talking about the late 19th and early 20th
century, when Jim Crow laws in the South
segregated schools, and talented blacks
generally attended 'Negro colleges,' which
sometimes emphasized more of a community
college atmosphere rather than a university one.
I'm not sure about the situation in the North--
DuBois did graduate from Harvard in 1890.
And now that society bends over backwards for blacks to become
educated, even to the point of providing unconstitutional racial
preferences, the academic achievement gap keeps widening.
That has been discussed before in misc.education,
and I believe it was stated that it is not clear that
preference points given to blacks added up to
more than those given to whites for other reasons.
Yes, such as legacy admissions BUT not all whites are accorded these
preferences. By contrast ALL blacks qualify on a racial basis.
Furthermore, blacks may also be "entitled" to legacy admissions.
Post by laraine
In addition, even if blacks get some help when
going to college, many of them have been at a
disadvantage all their lives in inner city schools,
so I don't see how that could work well.
Yes, and I feel sorry for those who want to learn but cannot because
they're among a herd of the disinterested, disruptive, and dangerous.
But society's solution of "some help" in the form of racial
preferences is not the way to go.

The key is good parenting, to instill in their kids that education is
a not a white thing, but rather a precious gift for all.
Post by laraine
Post by unknown
Post by laraine
Post by Way Back Jack
Post by laraine
Good to know. I looked up a few
of the names in wikipedia to learn
more, and got information about some
very accomplished people indeed.
C. (laraine)
If you choose to live in fantasy world, knock y'self out.
Wikipedia describes a fantasy world???
A lotta feel-good left wing propaganda in Wikipedia.
It seems fair to me, though a bit US-centered. (Would
have to read it in other languages to know for sure.)
It is constantly criticized for inaccuracies, including the critiques
of the guy who developed it.
Topaz
2006-07-29 17:16:29 UTC
Permalink
It's a Wonderful Race

by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites througout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."

George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.

To which the son replied: "That's the truth dad. My anthropology
professor, Dr.Irving Silverstein, says so. He ought to know. Dr.
Silverstein is a well-respected Ph.D. People of your generation just
don't understand because you were raised in a White supremacist racist
society. That's why I've come to admire Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King as
the greatest man in American history. He stood up to the racists of
your generation. Because of him, my generation of White kids is
completely colorblind."

The father angrily replied: "That's bullshit! I've always been
fair-minded and tolerant of people from all backgrounds and races. I
haven't 'oppressed' anybody, and furthermore there's nothing wrong
with being proud of one's own people, including the European race of
people. Your race is in your blood. It's like an extension of your
biological family and you ought to be proud of your European heritage
and identity, just like every other racial group in America is proud
of its. Why is it OK for them to have a strong sense of racial
identity but it's evil for us Europeans to feel that way?"

The young "intellectual" laughed at his father. "Come on dad, that's
the kind of crap Hitler tried to peddle. Those racist attitudes were
discredited years ago. There's only one race and that's the human
race. Diversity is our greatest strength. Differences in so-called
"race" are as insignificant as differences in belly buttons. And
besides, UN statistics now show that low White birth rates, along with
the fact that we live in an multicultural
society, will mean that Europeans and their ethnocentrist and racist
culture will have died out by the end of the century," young George
said.

Turning red with anger, the father yelled: "You are a walking cliché
you know that boy? And you think it's a good thing that the European
peoples of the world will have faded out and ceased to exist?" Young
George replied; "I think it's great! It will mean the end of racism
and the end of hate. The oppressed peoples of the world would have
been better off if us racist Europeans had never existed to begin
with."

Suddenly there was a blast of cold wind, an explosion, and a huge
smoke cloud. When the smoke had settled, George found himself alone
and lost in a cold open field. An angel named Clarence then appeared
to him and said "Well George, you've got your wish."

George asked: "Where am I? What's going on here? And who are you?"

The angel answered, "George, I'm Clarence the Angel. I was sent here
to show you what the world would have been like if Europeans, or
Whites, had never existed. You now live in a world where Europeans
never existed."

"Oh. That's cool. I'll have no problem adapting because there's not a
racist bone in my body. And when I get back to my world, I'll be able
to tell my professor and my friends how great this non-racist world
was. Say, I'm freezing my ass off out here. Where's the nearest
motel?"

"Motel?" replied the angel. "There are no motels here in what was once
called North America. But there are some caves up in those mountains
where you can find shelter."

"Caves? No way man. I want a nice warm bed to sleep in."

"I don't think you understand George. There are no buildings here in
non-white America because the evil Europeans never came here to build
them. Whites never existed, remember? The natives live in tents. Would
you like to go meet some local Indians? Perhaps they'll let you stay
in a tent."

"A tent? But it's 10 degrees outside?...Oh well. It's better than a
cave I suppose. Let's go talk to these Indians...... Wait a second,
are these Indians friendly or hostile?"

"Why, George, that's a racist question to ask. Just because some
Indians were brutal savages who scalped their victims alive, it
doesn't mean they all were" said the angel sarcastically.

"I know that Clarence. And I'm not a racist. I hate racism.
Nonetheless, I'd feel safer if I could have a gun to defend myself if
they turn out to be violent."

"Gun?" replied the angel. "There are no guns for you to defend
yourself with. Firearms were invented by evil Europeans. Though we
could make a spear with those twigs over there."

"That's too much work. Give me a telephone then. I'll call the Indians
to ask if it's OK."

"Telephone"? replied the angel. There are no telephones here.
Alexander Graham Bell was another evil white man, so he never existed.
No Europeans remember?" "Forget it then" replied George. "I'll sleep
in the damn cave."

Upon arriving at the cave, a shivering George asked the angel for a
lighter so that he could light a fire. "A lighter?" replied Clarence.
"There are no lighters here, and no matches. Those are European
gadgets and evil Europeans never existed remember? If you want to get
warm, you need to do like the locals do and start rubbing twigs
together."

"Oh come on man! You mean to tell me these people still rub sticks
together for fire?"

"That's right George. The Indians live exactly as they did before the
evil pilgrims arrived from Europe just a few centuries ago." said the
angel sarcastically.

"I refuse to stay in this cold cave and I damn sure ain't gonna light
a fire with twigs, and I refuse to sleep in a teepee. I'll go to South
America. I can make it in a warmer climate and I'll adapt quickly to
the great Incan civilization I learned about at college. Since
European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro never existed, the
Incans will still be there.
... I need a car"

"Car?" replied the angel. "There are no cars here. Daimler and Benz,
the evil German inventors of the internal combustion engine, were
never born..nor was Henry Ford. There are no paved roads either. This
is a world without evil Europeans remember?"

"No cars! Oh. I'll just have to take a train."

"There are no trains in this world either George. Evil Europeans
weren't here to build locomotive engines or to discover the many uses
of coal, oil and gas, or to build trains or lay tracks. But I'll allow
you to cheat just a bit. Grab hold of my magic robe and we'll fly
south."

George touched the angel's robe and they flew south until they arrived
in an abandoned mud hut in the midst of Incan territory. George was
grateful for the warm weather but it wasn't long until he began to
complain about the heat and humidity.

"Clarence, this hut is a little shithole and I'm sweating up a storm
here. Get me an air-conditioner please."

"Air-conditioner?" replied the angel. "There are no air-conditioners
here. Air conditioning and refrigeration were inventions created by
evil White men." "What?!! You mean to tell me that in the year 2002
these people still haven't figured out a way to keep themselves or
their food cool? a frustrated George asked.

"No George, they haven't. And they never will."

"This is ridiculous. Let's go to the main city to see the Emperor. I
can't live like like this. Where's a car...oh I forget...no cars!
Dammit I'll walk. let's go."

After walking through the jungle for about an hour or so, it began to
get dark. George then asked Clarence to give him a flashlight so that
he could see. "Flashlight? Sorry George, but Thomas Edison was an evil
White man too...and he was never born. There are some branches over
there if you want to make a torch."

"Never mind that!" George shouted back.

By morning time, Clarence and George had arrived at the temple of the
Incans. A bloody human sacrifice was in progress. George turned to
Clarence and cried, "They're going to butcher that poor soul! Somebody
has got to stop this. What horrible murdering beasts! Can't anyone
stop them?"

The angel replied "I'm afraid not. Ritual killings are common place
here."Those evil European racists like Columbus, Cortez and Pizzaro
never existed so the Incans just continued their brutal ways. In fact,
it was the oppressed peoples themselves who made up the bulk of the
Spanish armed forces. The people saw the Spaniards as liberators who
would rid them of the oppressive Incan and Mayan rulers and give them
a better life."

"I can't blame them for helping the Spaniards then. This is a horrible
place. Get me out of this shithole now!" said George.

'Where would you like to go?" Clarence replied.

George said: "Take me to Africa, maybe there's a more advanced and
humane civilization there that I can fit into. Where the nearest
airport?"

"Oh, I forgot...no Wright Brothers." George said. "How about a boat?"

"Boats?" replied the angel. "I'm afraid the most seaworthy rafts
available to you won't be of much help in crossing the vast Atlantic
Ocean. The great Viking sailors and European navigators never existed.
No Phoenicians, no Leif Erikson, no Henry the Navigator, no Columbus,
no Magellan, no Hudson and no Robert Fulton. Even if you could build
your own ship, there would be no compass for you to navigate with and
no sextant either. I'm afraid you're stuck here George."

"Can I touch your robe and fly to Africa then" asked George.

"You're cheating again George, but all right. Touch my robe and we'll
fly to Africa."

When they arrived in Africa, George saw thousands of half-naked
African tribesmen being herded along a dirt path. They were guarded by
other Africans with spears. "What are they doing to those poor men?"
George asked Clarence.

"They are being enslaved by another tribe. Slavery was common in
Africa long before the whites arrived." Clarence said. "In fact, most
of the slaves who were shipped to the Americas were sold to the slave
traders by African tribal leaders."

"That's so sad.' George said. "I want to meet Martin Luther King.
Since his White assassin never existed, this great man should still be
alive. He's probably a great tribal chief somewhere and leader of an
advanced civilization. He will free these slaves from their African
masters. Take me to him Clarence."

Clarence led George to a little hut deep in the heart of Africa. The
naked women and children looked at George in wonder. The young men
were out on a hunt but the older men stayed behind. George was led to
the dingy little hut of the tribal witchdocter and spiritual leader.
There he saw a wild-looking man with a necklace of teeth around his
neck and a huge ring pierced through his nose. "What the hell is that?
George asked.

"Meet Witch-doctor Matunbo Lutamba Kinga" Clarence said. He never
became Reverend Martin Luther King because there were no universities
or seminaries built to educate him. Europeans weren't there to create
such opportunities. But he did become the tribe's spiritual leader. He
specilaizes in casting evil spells. Perhaps he can help you?"

The witch doctor gazed in wonder at George. Then he motioned to his
henchmen to seize young George. The tribesmen grabbed hold of George
and tied him to a nearby tree.

"Stop it! Let me go. What are they going to do to me?" cried George
hysterically.

"They're going to perform a ritual killing on you George. The good
doctor King...I mean Kinga -- believes that by cutting your heart out
while you are still alive, it will bring good fortune and fertility to
his tribe," laughed Clarence.

"Clarence! Clarence! Help me Clarence! Help me!

"But George, you told me that you wanted to go to Africa and to meet
your hero Reverend King."

George said: "This part of Africa has not developed yet. I can see
that now. Take me to North Africa where Egypt and Carthage established
great civilizations. Just get me out of here, please."

Just as the witch doctor's spear was about to carve out George's
heart, George vanished into thin air. He then found himself on the
banks of the river Nile in Egypt.

"Thank you Clarence. Thank you," George said. "I don't understand it
Clarence. Why does so much of the world remain so brutal and
primitive? I learned during Black History Month about many talented
black inventors and scientists. Garrett Morgan, George Washington
Carver, Benjamin Banneker, Granville Woods. Then there's Dr. Carson,
the preeminent brain surgeon in all of America. Where are these men?"

Clarense replied: "Don't you understand yet? America, and Africa,
exist exactly as they did before the Europeans discovered them.
Civilization as you had known it had only been introduced to these
people just a few centuries ago by the Europeans. There are no
universities, no hospitals, no means of transportation other than
animals, no science, no medicine, no machines. In fact, the wheel
hasn't even been discovered in Sub-Saharan
Africa! Those black scientists, inventors, doctors, athletes, and
entertainers you speak of were never given the opportunity to realize
their full human potential because Europeans weren't around to
introduce higher civilization and learning to them. There are no
George Washington Carvers in this non-European world, no Dr. Carsons,
no Booker T. Washingtons, no Benjamin Bannekers, no Michael Jordans,
no Oprah Winfreys, no Bill Cosbys, no..."

"Stop it! That can't be!" cried George. "Let's walk over to the great
pyramids of Egypt right now and I'll show you one of the great wonders
of the world .....built by non-Whites"

They walked a few miles before George stopped and asked where the
nearest toilet was. "Toilets?" replied the angel. There are no toilets
or urinals in this world. Plumbing was developed by evil Europeans.
The people in this non-White world still relieve themselves in open
fields."

Clarence turned around so George could do his business. "I need some
toilet paper." George said.

"Toilet paper?" replied the angel. "There..."

"I know. I know. Toilet paper hasn't been invented yet. Just hand me a
rag then".

Clarence obliged and the two of them went on their way.

"I don't understand. According to my recollections from Geography
class, the great pyramids should be near this very spot. We ought to
be able to see them from miles away," said George.

"Well, George, I'm sure your professors at the college never told you
this, but the ancient Egyptians were not black or brown. They were
Caucasians. The anthropologists who examined the Egyptian mummies
confirmed this fact. There are no pyramids and no Sphinx either. And
the Carthaginians were White too."

George became depressed, but he was determined to prove his beliefs.
"What's in Europe?" he asked.

"Europe became populated by Huns and other Asiatic tribes. They've
settled down a bit but life is much the same as it is in North
America. A nomadic existence based on hunting and food gathering. No
great cities, no science, no buildings, no culture, no fine art - just
a hard daily struggle against life and the elements of nature. In a
Europe without evil Whites, the Roman Empire never existed nor did the
Greeks. There was no Renaisance either."

"Take me to Asia then. Surely the great civilizations of Persia,
India, China, and Japan will suit me" George said. "Clarence, to the
Taj Mahal please." "The Taj Mahal?" replied the angel. "Don't you know
that the ancient Persian and Indian civilizations were established by
ancient Indo-European tribes who crossed the Himalayas? They are the
ones who civilized India and built the Taj Mahal. Those are the great
civilizations
that Marco Polo, Columbus, and others were searching for.Did you know
that Iran is Persian for "land of the Aryan?"

George said: "Don't tell me that the Indians were White men! That
can't be. In the world I came from, I knew many Indians and they were
not White!"

Clarence explained: "As the centuries passed, the Indo-Europeans who
created Indian civilization intermarried with the native majorities
who populated the Indian subcontinent. Gradually there were less and
less evil White people until they faded out completely, along with the
advanced civilization they had built. You will notice that there are
still a few white-skinned and fair-haired Indians and Pakistanis
around today -- in the world you came from that is.

George became worried. He knew he could never fit into the harsh
primitive world he had been thrust into. Suddenly he thought of Japan.
"Japan! I'll show you now Clarence. Take me to Japan. If the Japanese
can make TVs and cameras then I'm sure I'll find a decent civilization
that I can live in."

Clarence transported George to Japan. George observed that Japanese
society was the most orderly, advanced and civil that he had seen, but
it seemed as if almost everyone was either a rice farmer, a fisherman,
or a soldier. There were no cars, no skyscapers, no lights, no
stereos, no sciences, no technologies, no universities. It was a
stagnant agricultural society that seemed to have reached its high
water mark and was incapable of moving forward. George knew he could
not live here either.

Clarence explained to George: "Even the industrious Japanese and
Chinese peoples had to rely on the evil Europeans to build the modern
Asia that you had in mind. In this world, Japan exists exactly as it
did before Commodore Perry's American naval ships arrived in Japan in
the 1850s. There's no industry, no technology, no Fuji film, no Sony,
no Hitachi, no Panasonic, no Toyota, no Sushi bars, no baseball...none
of the trappings or comforts of modern life. These things don't exist
in Japan or anywhere else because
Europeans weren't there to create them and share them with the rest of
the world. Would you care for a bowl of rice George?"

George began to feel sick in both his body and his mind. Not only was
he depressed, but exposure to the harsh elements of nature had left
him physically ill. "Clarence, I seem to have contracted some type of
sickness. I must have some anti-biotics."

"Anti-biotics? There's no...

"Oh Shut up already! Then just take me back to the world as it was!"

"Sorry George. I'm not authorized to do that. Only my boss can make
that call." Clarence said to him: "You see George. Your father was
right. You really had a wonderful race. Don't you see what a foolish
mistake it is to be ashamed and guilty about your own people, and to
let them die out? This is what the world would be like without the
creative spark of Edison and Ford and Pasteur and Marconi. No great
scientists, or mathematicians, or inventors or fine artists. No
Archimedes, no Aristotle, no Socrates, no
Alexander, no Renaissance, no Newton, no Kepler, no Goddard, no
Mendel, no Tesla, no Faraday, no Guttenberg, no Shakespeare, no
Dickens, no Twain, no Mozart, no Beethoven, no Da Vinci, no
Michelangelo, no Galileo, no Copernicus. No Venice, no Paris, no
Lisbon, no Madrid, no Zurich, no Berlin, no St. Petersburg, no
Budapest, no Rome, no Milan, no Vienna, no London, no New York, no
Rio, no Sydney. No orchestras, no museums, no universities, no
hospitals, no libraries, no theaters, no radio, no books, no
television, no electricity, no refrigeration, no heating, no plumbing,
no houses, no steel, no stadiums, no vaccines, no cars, no planes, no
trains, no ships, no
dentists, no surgeons, no computers, no telephones, and most important
- there's no creative genius to be found that could create and sustain
such a high level of civilization. There's nothing for the people of
this world to build upon. It's just a daily struggle for subsistence.
A brutal planet where the few people who aren't mired in eternal
ignorance and darkness have reached their peak of civilization and are
advancing no further."

Clarence went on to lecture the broken and depressed young man for
seven days straight. He covered everything. History, science,
economics, philosophy, art, literature, fine music, architecture,
medicine, politics, agriculture, religion, and all the creations and
contributions that the European peoples had made in every conceivable
field of human endeavor. George listened closely to every word. He
felt like a man who had been
reborn.

After his lecture, Clarence the Angel floated away towards heaven. "I
hope you have found all this to be educational, and I hope you have
learned an important lesson. Enjoy your world George!" mocked the
departing angel.

George began to sob like a baby. It was the year 2002 and he was alone
and hungry in a backwards world where Europeans had never existed. He
cried out to the stars: "Please God. I see what a fool I've been. I
understand now what my father was trying to tell me. I want to go back
to the world that I came from. A world where Europeans not only
existed, but blessed the rest of humanity world with their unique
creative ability. I want to live in a civilized world. Please
God!...take me back!...take me back!...Oh God....please."

Suddenly George was transported back to his college dormitory. Drunk
with joy, George jumped into the showers before he could even take his
clothes off!.

"Warm water! and soap! Life is beautiful!" he screamed.

George's floormates looked at him as if he was crazy. "George! Have
you gone crazy?" asked a bewildered schoolmate.

"No my friend. I haven't taken leave of my senses. I've come to them!"
George replied. George then began to sing classic European folk songs
in the shower. Miraculously, he was able to sing in many different
languages. He sang O Sole Mio in Italian, Amazing Grace in English,
Gloire Immortelle in French, Das Ist Der Tag in German, and also
Belgian, Spanish and French ballads and waltzes. Tears of sheer joy
began to stream down his cheeks. The degenerate music of Hip-Hop and
Rap lost all of its appeal to young George.

After his shower, George drove to a nearby restaurant and ordered two
whole entrees. One was Lasagna and the other was a delicious Veal
Marsala. With his Italian food he had a Greek salad with Spanish
olives and Russian dressing, drank a whole bottle of French wine,
followed by a German pastry for dessert. He finished his meal off with
a hot cup of English tea and a Cuban cigar.

George said out loud: "Oh those European peoples and their delicious
cuisine. Clarence was right after all. What a wonderful race!"

George was happy, but at the same time he realized there was much work
to be done. He thought of all those poor whites in Rhodesia and South
Africa who were being murdered and raped ever since they gave up
control of those once-European nations. He thought of the many
thousands of qualified Whites who were passed up for good jobs and
college entrance because of racial quotas that discriminate against
Europeans. He thought about the declining birthrates among all the
European nations of the world. He remembered that
Europeans everywhere were dwindling in numbers every year even as
their own nations were being flooded with third world immigration. He
recalled the O.J. Simpson verdict and how millions of blacks in
America cheered when that brutal double murderer was set free by a
black jury after he stabbed two Whites to death. He remembered the Los
Angeles riots of 1992, where dozens of Whites were dragged out of
their vehicles and killed like dogs in the streets by packs of
White-hating monsters who were never even punished! He remembered the
time when Jesse Jackson led a cheer at Stanford University: "Hey Hey
Ho Ho, Western Civ. has got to go!" His European blood began to
boil in righteous indignation when he recalled how Jesse Jackson once
said he had spit in White people's food when he was a young restaurant
worker. George now understood that that his people were on a collision
course with worldwide disaster and genocide. George realized that this
great people must not perish from the face of the earth.

George could not wait to see his father. He longed to embrace him and
apologize for all of the foolish and disrespectful things he had said
to him. But first, George had a score to settle with a certain college
professor. He walked into Dr. Silverstein's auditorium and quietly
took a seat in the back row. The nasal voiced Silverstein was
lecturing on and on
about racial and gender inequalities in European-centered
civilizations. It was vintage Silverstein. George's impressionable
White schoolmates, with their baggy pants, hip-hop clothes and
backwards baseball caps, were swallowing Silverstein's poison pills
hook, line and sinker. After letting Silverstein spew his cultural
poison for about 15 minutes or so, George raised his hand so that he
could give the professor a piece of his newly educated mind.

"George? Is that you? I remember you from last semester. I wasn't
aware that you were here today. I failed to recognize you in that
shirt and tie, and without your earrings. You must have enjoyed my
course so much that you signed up again eh? Class, I'd like for you to
meet George. He was one of my brightest students last semester. He
truly has a thorough grasp of the ideas presented in this course.
George, would you be so kind as to tell my class about that brilliant
term paper you wrote about European racism,
imperialism, and the need for monetary reparations?"

That's when young George let loose on the unsuspecting Professor.

"ENOUGH! You scheming devil! You mendacious fabricator of falsehoods!
You pusillanimous purveyor of pinko propaganda! How dare you try to
corrupt and manipulate our young minds when your filthy lies. We
Europeans have nothing to be ashamed of, nothing to apologize for, and
everything to be proud of. And most of all, we don't owe anybody
jack-shit - not one thin dime! To the contrary, it is the rest of
humanity that owes us a debt which can never be repaid! We are the
rightful heirs and protectors of a rich cultural heritage. You vile
manipulator! We are the sons of the Romans, the sons of
the Greeks, the Celtics, the Vikings, the Normans, the Saxons. Why do
you inflict shame and guilt upon us? We Europeans didn't just
contribute to civilization...WE ARE CIVILIZATION! And I declare that I
will no longer tolerate you shithead "intellectuals" trying to tear
our people down. Never again will we walk on eggshells when we speak,
always fearing that we might be called "racist." I no longer care what
people think. All that matters is the truth which you have sought to
pervert!"

"What are you up to anyway? Why do you to corrupt my young peers by
shoving false heroes down their throats. Enough of your Marxist games
of divide and conquer, you commie pinko subversive! I don't want to
learn anymore about Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton or
Black History Month. They would not have amounted to anything without
the institutions of high civilization created by the European peoples.
I'm going to set this class straight about who the truly great men of
history are - the European
statesmen, scientists, explorers, monarchs, navigators, conquerors,
inventors, artists, writers, philosophers - the innovative giants of
history that you and your ilk have erased from our collective
memories. You speak of a world liberated from European influence?
Permit me tell your students about such a world, Silverstein, because
I can speak from personal experience, you wretched little conspiring
monster!"

Silverstein turned white as a ghost. He was shellshocked and rendered
speechless for the first time in his career! Never in all of his years
at the University had a student dared to so boldly challenge his
falsehoods. Speaking from the heart as well as the mind, and with an
eloquence he never thought he could muster, George broke out into a
60-minute monologue on history, science, philosophy, culture, and all
the other attributes that
constitute high civilization. The young students were captivated by
George's brilliant oratory. Many were moved to tears. By the end of
his tirade, George's reawakened classmates were thundering their
approval of his speech. The class gave George a standing ovation and
they thanked him for helping them rediscover and reclaim their own
sense of pride and lost identity. The unstoppable power of truth had
melted away years of Marxist guilt tripping, self hate, wimpishness
and cultural brainwashing in just one unforgettable hour. The inspired
students proceeded to storm out of Silverstein's class,
throwing their hip-hop baseball caps and nose earrings at him as they
stampeded out and vowed never to return. They lifted George up upon
their shoulders and carried him out of the auditorium like a
conquering hero. With a glint in his eye, George glanced up towards
the sky, winked and said "Thank you, Clarence."

Dr. Silverstein was left humiliated and visibly shaken. He knew that
these reawakened European kids could never again be brainwashed with
"political correctness" and White guilt. Silverstein's greatest fear
was that more of these proud European youths would one day reawaken
and take their country and civilization back from the Silversteins of
the world.

Silverstein was worried, but he remained confident that most young men
and women would never learn the truth about their glorious past and
unique creative abilties. After all, the mass media, Hollywood, the
music industry, the colleges, and the public schools are all
controlled by "liberals" like Dr. Silverstein. With the power of
political correctness in their hands, they can continue to tear down
our European ancestors, destroy our
institutions and traditions, instigate blacks and other races against
the whites, flood America with third-world immigration, and push
"hip-hop" music, homosexuality, and other garbage onto a weak,
confused and morally degenerate youth. After reflecting upon these
facts, Silverstein smiled a devilish grin and muttered to himself: "A
few of these European sheep may wake up to what's being done to them,
but the majority of these idiots never will." And he smiled
again....and laughed with diabolical Marxist glee. Then
he repeated to himself "No...they will never figure it all out until
it's too late."

Or will they?


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
laraine
2006-08-05 05:33:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
It's a Wonderful Race
by James Bronson
There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites througout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."
George's dad was shocked to hear such talk. "Who put such commie-pinko
nonsense into your head, boy? Did one of your sandal-wearing hippie
college professors teach you that?" the father asked.
[Snip].....
In your story,
you seem to be suggesting that because 'whites'
have invented all kinds of technological wonders,
we should not feel so bad about the enslavement
of Africans, and the fact that millions of them were
transported from their culture to other parts of
the globe, for example. I'm sorry about that reality,
and I don't enjoy hearing about it myself, but it is
a reality, and we can't just deny it. Slavery within
Africa itself was not so widespread, except for
within ancient Egypt (which for some reason you argue
is 'white.'--think you have to admit that Egyptians
are often brownish, anyway, and many of their
ancient statues represent people with brownish
skins.)

Furthermore, don't see how we can assume that
certain peoples aren't intellectually capable of
developing technology. I don't suppose anyone knows
for sure why technology develops, but I believe there
are some theories such as: it is driven by need,
or it requires a certain culture that stresses the
abilities of the individual without external restrictions,
and perhaps in a secular way. And, of course, the
development of agriculture, large cities, etc., occurred
over thousands of years for various reasons that I'm
sure no one has completely unraveled for certain. If
one hunts/gathers for 15-20 hours a week in a
sparsely-populated area, and does reasonably well,
how can we expect our modern technologies to
develop? The Olmecs in Mesoamerica did have
the wheel, by the way.

As far as what happened in schools during
Reconstruction in post-CivilWar US South, I
think we can understand why some people had a
difficult time accepting quick change. Many of
us today in that situation would probably feel
the same way--I myself am fairly conservative
about quick social changes. I wasn't trying to
condemn that attitude, but rather just to
emphasize that blacks haven't had the same
kinds of opportunities as whites have had, even
though their opportunities have been increasing.

Here is an interesting quote I found--I will research more:
"...the evidence from cases of cross-racial adoption
suggests that the average IQs of blacks reared by
and among whites is no different from that of whites"
("Genome," by Matt Ridley, p. 86)

Here is a site about Cortez and the Aztecs,
Pizarro and the Incas, and a few other
Conquistadors:

<http://www.pbs.org/conquistadors/>

The stories of Orellana and Cabeza de Vaca are
different from what we would expect, and
de Vaca actually lived with Indians for some time,
and had good things to say about them.

C.
Topaz
2006-08-05 15:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by laraine
In your story,
you seem to be suggesting that because 'whites'
have invented all kinds of technological wonders,
They did.
Post by laraine
we should not feel so bad about the enslavement
of Africans,
Where in my post was anything like that?
Post by laraine
and the fact that millions of them were
transported from their culture to other parts of
the globe, for example.
Blacks and Jews Newspage
http://www.blacksandjews.com/

The following Jews were known dealers, owners, shippers or supporters
of
the slave trade and of the enslavement of Black African citizens in
early New York history.

Issack Asher
Jacob Barsimson
Joseph Bueno
Solomon Myers Cohen
Jacob Fonseca
Aberham Franckfort
Jacob Franks
Daniel Gomez
David Gomez
Isaac Gomez
Lewis Gomez
Mordecai Gomez
Rebekah Gomez
Ephraim Hart
Judah Hays
Harmon Hendricks
Uriah Hendricks
Uriah Hyam
Abraham Isaacs
Joshua Isaacs
Samuel Jacobs
Benjamin S. Judah
Cary Judah
Elizabeth Judah
Arthur Levy
Eleazar Levy
Hayman Levy
Isaac H. Levy
Jacob Levy
Joseph Israel Levy
Joshua Levy
Moses Levy
Uriah Phillips Levy
Isaac R. Marques
Moses Michaels
(E)Manuel Myers
Seixas Nathan
Simon Nathan
Rodrigo Pacheco
David Pardo
Isaac Pinheiro
Rachel Pinto
Morris Jacob Raphall
Abraham Sarzedas
Moses Seixas
Solomon Simpson
Nathan Simson
Simja De Torres
Benjamin Wolf
Alexander Zuntz

Jewish Role in Slavery: Quotes from Jewish historians
Moshe Kahan stated bluntly that in 1653-1658, "Jewish-Marrano
merchants were in control of the Spanish and Portuguese [slave] trade,
were almost in control of the Levantine trade...were interested in the
Dutch East and West Indian companies, were heavily involved in
shipping; and, most important, had at their disposal large amounts of
capital."
Lee M. Friedman, a one-time president of the American Jewish
Historical Society, wrote that in Brazil, where most of the Africans
actually went, "the bulk of the slave trade was in the hands of Jewish
settlers."
Herbert I. Bloom wrote that "the slave trade was one of the most
important Jewish activities here (in Surinam) as elsewhere in the
colonies." He even published a 1707 list of Jewish buyers by name with
the number of Black humans they purchased.
Cecil Roth, writer of 30 books and hundreds of articles on Jewish
history, wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America "were
largely directed against [Jews] as being the greatest slave-holders of
the region."
Seymour B. Liebman in his New World Jewry, made it clear that "[t]he
ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and
sailed under the command of Jewish captains."
In Brazil, where most black slaves were sent, Jewish scholar Arnold
Wiznitzer is most explicit about Jewish involvement:
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax
farming, [Jews] dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total
of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423
florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves
from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It
happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who
appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this
lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other
hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to
the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on
credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent
of the purchase value were often realized with high interest
rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a
Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on
Friday, October 21, 1644."
Post by laraine
I'm sorry about that reality,
and I don't enjoy hearing about it myself, but it is
a reality, and we can't just deny it. Slavery within
Africa itself was not so widespread, except for
within ancient Egypt (which for some reason you argue
is 'white.'--think you have to admit that Egyptians
are often brownish, anyway, and many of their
ancient statues represent people with brownish
skins.)
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."

Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98

The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.

Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249

The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8

"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.

A General Introduction to the Egyptian Collections in the the British
Museam. London, Harrison and Sons, 1930, p.49

The mummy of the wife of King Tutankhamen has auburn hair.

Carter, Michael, Tutankhamun, The Golden Monarch, N.Y. 1972 p.68

Red-haired mummies were found in the crocodile-caverns of Aboufaida.

Tomkins, Henry George, Remarks on Mr. Flinders Petries Collection of
Ethnographic Types from the Monuments of Egypt, Journal of the
Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Vol. XVIIII,
1889, p.216

The mummy of Rameses II has fine silky yellow hair.

Smith, G. Elliot and Dawson, Warren R. Egyptian Mummies, London,
George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1924 p.99

A blond mummy was found at Kawamil along with many chestnut-colored
ones.

De Lapouge, G. Vacher, L'Aryen, Sa Vie Sociale. Paris, Pichat, 1899,
p.26

Amenhotep III's tomb painting shows him as having light red
hair.

National Geographic Society, Ancient Egypt, Discovering its
Splendors,1978 p.103

An Egyptian scribe named Sakkarah around 2500 B.C. has blue eyes.

Strouhal, Eugen, Life of the Ancient Egyptians, Norman, Oklahoma,
University of Oklahoma Press, 1992, p.53

A common good luck charm was the eye of Horus, the so-called
Wedjat Eye. The eye is always blue, and the word "wedjat" means "blue"
in Egyptian.

Queen Thi is painted as having a rosy complexion, blue eyes and
blond hair.

Hamy, E.T., "Races Humaines de la Vallee du Nil" Bulletin de la
Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, 1886, p.739

Paintings from the Third Dynasty show native Egyptians with red
hair and blue eyes.

Pijoan, Jose, Historia del Arte Vol III, Madrid, Espasa-Calpe, 1932,
plate XI

The god Nuit was painted as white and blond.

Champollion, H., Le Nil et la Societe Egyptienne, Marseille, Musee
Boreby, 1973 p.94

A painting from Iteti's tomb at Saqqara shows a very Nordic-looking
man with blond hair.

Westendorf, Wolfhart, Painting, Sculpture and Architecture of Ancient
Egypt. New York, Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1968 p.65

Time-Life books recently put out a volume called Rameses II The
Great. It has a good picture of the blond mummy of Rameses II. Another
picture can be found in the book X-Raying the Pharaohs, especially the
picture on the jacket cover. It shows his yellow hair.

A book called Chronicle of the Pharaohs was recently published
showing paintings,scuptures and mummies of 189 pharaohs and leading
personalities of Ancient Egypt. Of these, 102 appear European, 13 look
black and the rest are hard to classify. All nine mummies look
European.

The very first pharaoh, Narmer, also known as Menes, looks very
European, The same can be said for Khufu's cousin Hemon, who designed
the Great Pyramid of Giza. A computer-generated reconstruction of the
face of the Sphinx shows a European-looking face.

Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books Alexandria, VA 1992 p.67

It was once painted sunburned red.

Silverberg, Robert, Before the Sphinx; Early Egypt N.Y., N.Y., T.
Nelson 1971 p.168

The Egyptians often painted upper class men as red and upper
class women as white; this because the men became sunburned or tanned
while outside under the burning Egyptian sun.

The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
Post by laraine
Furthermore, don't see how we can assume that
certain peoples aren't intellectually capable of
developing technology. I don't suppose anyone knows
for sure why technology develops, but I believe there
are some theories such as: it is driven by need,
or it requires a certain culture that stresses the
abilities of the individual without external restrictions,
and perhaps in a secular way. And, of course, the
development of agriculture, large cities, etc., occurred
over thousands of years for various reasons that I'm
sure no one has completely unraveled for certain. If
one hunts/gathers for 15-20 hours a week in a
sparsely-populated area, and does reasonably well,
how can we expect our modern technologies to
develop? The Olmecs in Mesoamerica did have
the wheel, by the way.
As far as what happened in schools during
Reconstruction in post-CivilWar US South, I
think we can understand why some people had a
difficult time accepting quick change. Many of
us today in that situation would probably feel
the same way--I myself am fairly conservative
about quick social changes. I wasn't trying to
condemn that attitude, but rather just to
emphasize that blacks haven't had the same
kinds of opportunities as whites have had, even
though their opportunities have been increasing.
"...the evidence from cases of cross-racial adoption
suggests that the average IQs of blacks reared by
and among whites is no different from that of whites"
("Genome," by Matt Ridley, p. 86)
"Scientist" who spout such PC are liberals first and scientists
second.


The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.

All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:

"One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.

The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)

A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)

RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY

IQ

Parental IQ 115.35
Biological Children 109.4
White Adopted children 105.6
Mulatto parents adopted children 98.5
Black parents adopted children 89.4

Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"

(88) Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739

(89) Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135

(90) Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27

(91) Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20
Post by laraine
Here is a site about Cortez and the Aztecs,
Pizarro and the Incas, and a few other
<http://www.pbs.org/conquistadors/>
The stories of Orellana and Cabeza de Vaca are
different from what we would expect, and
de Vaca actually lived with Indians for some time,
and had good things to say about them.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
laraine
2006-08-12 05:56:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Post by laraine
In your story,
you seem to be suggesting that because 'whites'
have invented all kinds of technological wonders,
They did.
Post by laraine
we should not feel so bad about the enslavement
of Africans,
Where in my post was anything like that?
Your post was essentially a quote of an
article by James Bronson, who seems to
be an 18-year-old activist(?)

Bronson:
Teacher implies we should feel bad about it.
George, after listening to Clarence the 'angel,'
says that teacher is a devil.
Post by Topaz
Post by laraine
and the fact that millions of them were
transported from their culture to other parts of
the globe, for example.
Blacks and Jews Newspage
http://www.blacksandjews.com/
The following Jews were known dealers, owners, shippers or supporters
of
the slave trade and of the enslavement of Black African citizens in
early New York history.
Issack Asher
Jacob Barsimson
Joseph Bueno
Solomon Myers Cohen
Jacob Fonseca
Aberham Franckfort
Jacob Franks
Daniel Gomez
David Gomez
Isaac Gomez
Lewis Gomez
Mordecai Gomez
Rebekah Gomez
Ephraim Hart
Judah Hays
Harmon Hendricks
Uriah Hendricks
Uriah Hyam
Abraham Isaacs
Joshua Isaacs
Samuel Jacobs
Benjamin S. Judah
Cary Judah
Elizabeth Judah
Arthur Levy
Eleazar Levy
Hayman Levy
Isaac H. Levy
Jacob Levy
Joseph Israel Levy
Joshua Levy
Moses Levy
Uriah Phillips Levy
Isaac R. Marques
Moses Michaels
(E)Manuel Myers
Seixas Nathan
Simon Nathan
Rodrigo Pacheco
David Pardo
Isaac Pinheiro
Rachel Pinto
Morris Jacob Raphall
Abraham Sarzedas
Moses Seixas
Solomon Simpson
Nathan Simson
Simja De Torres
Benjamin Wolf
Alexander Zuntz
Is that it? There are millions of slaves, and you
can only list a handful of Jewish people involved
with slavery? Not too convincing.
Post by Topaz
Jewish Role in Slavery: Quotes from Jewish historians
Moshe Kahan stated bluntly that in 1653-1658, "Jewish-Marrano
merchants were in control of the Spanish and Portuguese [slave] trade,
were almost in control of the Levantine trade...were interested in the
Dutch East and West Indian companies, were heavily involved in
shipping; and, most important, had at their disposal large amounts of
capital."
Lee M. Friedman, a one-time president of the American Jewish
Historical Society, wrote that in Brazil, where most of the Africans
actually went, "the bulk of the slave trade was in the hands of Jewish
settlers."
Herbert I. Bloom wrote that "the slave trade was one of the most
important Jewish activities here (in Surinam) as elsewhere in the
colonies." He even published a 1707 list of Jewish buyers by name with
the number of Black humans they purchased.
Cecil Roth, writer of 30 books and hundreds of articles on Jewish
history, wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America "were
largely directed against [Jews] as being the greatest slave-holders of
the region."
Seymour B. Liebman in his New World Jewry, made it clear that "[t]he
ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and
sailed under the command of Jewish captains."
In Brazil, where most black slaves were sent, Jewish scholar Arnold
"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax
farming, [Jews] dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total
of 23,163 Negro slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423
florins. The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves
from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It
happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who
appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this
lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other
hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to
the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on
credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent
of the purchase value were often realized with high interest
rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a
Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on
Friday, October 21, 1644."
I looked up a few of these names; they are not
generally specialists in Jewish history, and some
of the books date from the 30's. So you pick out
one or a few sentences of a book-- what's in the
other couple hundred pages of these books? For
all you know, you could be missing the whole
context of the information.
Post by Topaz
Post by laraine
I'm sorry about that reality,
and I don't enjoy hearing about it myself, but it is
a reality, and we can't just deny it. Slavery within
Africa itself was not so widespread, except for
within ancient Egypt (which for some reason you argue
is 'white.'--think you have to admit that Egyptians
are often brownish, anyway, and many of their
ancient statues represent people with brownish
skins.)
"Queen Hetop-Heres II, of the Fourth Dynasty, the daughter of Cheops,
the builder of the great pyramid, is shown in the colored bas reliefs
of her tomb to have been a distinct blonde. Her hair is painted a
bright yellow stippled with little red horizontal lines, and her skin
is white."
Coon, Carleton Stevens. The Races of Europe. New York City, Macmillan.
1939, p.98
The tomb of the wife of Zoser, the builder of the first pyramid in
Egypt, has a painting of her showing her with reddish-blond hair.
Heyerdahl, Thor, The Ra Expeditions, Garden City, Doubleday, 1971,
p.249
The mummy of Rameses II has yellow hair.
Egypt: Land of the Pharaohs, Time-Life books, Alexandria, VA 1992 p.8
"A funerary mask with the attributes of the goddess Isis shows a
vivid blue-green color of eyes.
[snip of similar material]
Post by Topaz
The information above is part of the information compiled by
Phillip Bonner and was printed in The Barnes Review, 130 Third Street,
SE, Washington, D.C. 20003
I've only heard a little about it, but my
understanding was that a Pharoah kept
what amounted to a harem, so it seems that
wives could have been brought from afar;
therefore, it wouldn't be too surprising to me
if their coloring and the coloring of their
children differed slightly from the norm.

Also, I don't think we can judge by the
coloring of a goddess, which could be
fantastical.

You will find this article about Egyptian
hair interesting--
<http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/hair2.html>

Quote from the article:
As one scholar put it: "The most common hair colour,
then as now, was a very dark brown, almost black
colour although natural auburn and even rather
surprisingly blonde hair are also to be found."
Post by Topaz
Post by laraine
"...the evidence from cases of cross-racial adoption
suggests that the average IQs of blacks reared by
and among whites is no different from that of whites"
("Genome," by Matt Ridley, p. 86)
"Scientist" who spout such PC are liberals first and scientists
second.
Matt Ridley has a Doctorate in zoology from
University of Oxford in England, and I have seen
one reference to him as a libertarian, though I
don't know the details.
Post by Topaz
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China.
Because you say so? Implicit in all this
is that a high IQ is the only trait that makes a
person superior to others.
Post by Topaz
It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Oh, that sounds like a neutral source.
Post by Topaz
"One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.
The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)
A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)
RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY
IQ
Parental IQ 115.35
Biological Children 109.4
White Adopted children 105.6
Mulatto parents adopted children 98.5
Black parents adopted children 89.4
Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"
(88) Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739
(89) Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135
(90) Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27
(91) Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20
Well, as I said, I'd have to research more,
and I'm guessing that there have been
articles that express other viewpoints.

C. (laraine)
Topaz
2006-08-12 16:13:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by laraine
Your post was essentially a quote of an
article by James Bronson, who seems to
be an 18-year-old activist(?)
Teacher implies we should feel bad about it.
George, after listening to Clarence the 'angel,'
says that teacher is a devil.
This is what it said:

There once was a college freshman named George who thought he knew it
all. One night over dinner, George got into an argument with his
father. The argument began when the young student tried to explain to
his father that as White people, they should be held accountable for
all the evils that they had inflicted upon non-Whites througout
history. George explained: "Because of European racism, we stole the
Indians' land, we held blacks in slavery, we persecuted the Jews, and
we plundered the environment. We've been oppressive racists for
thousands of years so it's only fair that we pay economic reparations
for all the harm we've done to the world. I'm pleased to see that we
are ending our political and economic domination of the oppressed
peoples."

It is not saying slavery is a good thing. It is saying let's look at
the good that Whites have done. It is saying that the media and
schools are controlled by evil people who hate the White race when in
fact Whites are a wonderful race.
Post by laraine
Is that it? There are millions of slaves, and you
can only list a handful of Jewish people involved
with slavery? Not too convincing.
Jews owned the slave ships.
Post by laraine
I looked up a few of these names; they are not
generally specialists in Jewish history, and some
of the books date from the 30's. So you pick out
one or a few sentences of a book-- what's in the
other couple hundred pages of these books? For
all you know, you could be missing the whole
context of the information.
I've only heard a little about it, but my
understanding was that a Pharoah kept
what amounted to a harem, so it seems that
wives could have been brought from afar;
therefore, it wouldn't be too surprising to me
if their coloring and the coloring of their
children differed slightly from the norm.
Also, I don't think we can judge by the
coloring of a goddess, which could be
fantastical.
You will find this article about Egyptian
hair interesting--
<http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/hair2.html>
As one scholar put it: "The most common hair colour,
then as now, was a very dark brown, almost black
colour although natural auburn and even rather
surprisingly blonde hair are also to be found."
Matt Ridley has a Doctorate in zoology from
University of Oxford in England, and I have seen
one reference to him as a libertarian, though I
don't know the details.
That doesn't mean he would put real science before political
correctness. In fact, if he want to keep his job he has to put
political correctness first.
Post by laraine
Post by Topaz
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China.
Because you say so?
Few people assert that Europe is not better than Africa. They would
lose credibility if they were that PC.
Post by laraine
Implicit in all this
is that a high IQ is the only trait that makes a
person superior to others.
Absolutely untrue. Intelligent people can be quite evil, and very
unintelligent people might be quite good. Maybe you have in some way
been conditioned to see things that are not there, and to think you
have read things that I have not written.
Post by laraine
Post by Topaz
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke.
Oh, that sounds like a neutral source.
Your PC media conditions you to think what sounds right. The fact is
that your media is the untrustworthy source, all of it, Your TV, your
magazines and newspapers, and your bookstores. You are like the people
in the movie "The Island". Your world is all lies.
Post by laraine
Well, as I said, I'd have to research more,
and I'm guessing that there have been
articles that express other viewpoints.
You could just use your eyes. Take a look at Black neighborhoods and
White neighborhoods. You might go to Africa for a closer look at
things but for most that is overkill and looking at Black
neighborhoods is enough.


http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/

Loading...